This week we watched three modalities of delivering the same
message. The differences were simple but interesting.
How did your
interpretation of the message change from one modality to the next?
Email: Jane
communication to Mark seems fairly clear. The interpretation of the message is based
solely on the words written with no urgency. Dr. Stolovitch stated, in the
weeks ‘media resource that a message should be communicated with a clear
purpose that stated the situation (Laureate Education, Inc., n.d.). Jane email
message began with a clear purpose.
Voicemail: In the
voicemail message a sense of an urgent was conveyed more than in the email. It is
not so much that the words were different but the tone was more businesslike. The
fact that she picks up a phone rather than sending an email make the need more pressing.
Face-to-face: The
face-to-face message was less formal to me than the email or voicemail. The delivery of this message didn’t seem as if
the report was as pressing as previously mentioned in the email and voicemail
requests. Her body language is pleasant and easygoing. She is smiling and seems
relaxed. This is probably the least urgent of the three modalities.
What factors
influenced how you perceived the message?
I think the email message is the most effective. It is
clear, concise and straight to the point. The direction is clear of what is needed
as well as a direction on how to return the information. Although, the voicemail
conveys the most urgency.
Which form of
communication best conveyed the true meaning and intent of the message?
The email form of the message best conveys the true meaning
and intent of the message. It is clear and directly to the point.
What are the
implications of what you learned from this exercise for communicating
effectively with members of a project team?
Good communication is vital. Without effective communication all parties can suffer. The consequences are that the method chosen to communicate can affect the sense of urgency and important of information needed.
Good communication is vital. Without effective communication all parties can suffer. The consequences are that the method chosen to communicate can affect the sense of urgency and important of information needed.
References
Laureate Education (Producer). (n.d.). Communicating with
stakeholders [Video file]. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu
The Art of Effective Communication. (n.d.). Retrieved March
22, 2017, fromhttp://mym.cdn.laureatemedia.com/2dett4d/Walden/EDUC/6145/03/mm/aoc/index.html
No comments:
Post a Comment